• Law360 Reports on Texas Supreme Court Affirms Lower Court’s Ruling Concerning Royalties in Samson Exploration LLC v. T.S. Reed Properties Inc. July 7, 2017
    Paul Simpson - Chris Halgren - Don Magee - Derrick Price Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn More Options

    Recently, Law360 reported on the Texas Supreme Court ruled in June 2017 in favor of McGinnis Lochridge clients, the T.S. Reed family interests and other royalty owners (represented by Partners Paul F. Simpson, Christopher L. Halgren, Don H. Magee and J. Derrick Price), in Samson Exploration LLC v. T.S. Reed Properties Inc.

    In Samson v. Reed, the Court affirmed a prior ruling by the Beaumont Court of Appeals that upheld a judgment against Samson for multiple breaches of oil and gas leases. The largest part of the judgment was for not paying royalty to the Reed owners on production from a Samson-operated well in a Samson-operated unit into which Samson had pooled that lease.  Because that unit overlapped an earlier Samson unit that included the same well, Samson argued it did not have to pay royalty on that well to the second unit’s royalty owners.

    The Texas Supreme Court unanimously rejected Samson’s argument to hold that Samson had to comply with its contractual obligations. As partner Paul Simpson told Law360, the Texas Supreme Court again upheld the rule of law in the Reed case: "Those who, like Oklahoma-based Samson, rely on what the Court called 'contract-avoidance' theories to justify breaking their promises should know that, in Texas, a deal is still a deal."

    Read the full article:

    "Texas High Court Says Contract Law Rules In Royalty Row", Law360, June 23, 2017 (subscription required)